V1 Beta. This is a first release for early review by internal and external audiences.

Skip to content

Research and resources

This page brings together the research materials that provide the empirical foundation for the principles of the Wikimedia attribution framework. As our work progresses, we will continue to add new findings and resources to support a clearer, evidence-based understanding of the impact of attribution across reuse scenarios.

Relevant studies

Quantitative Study on Attribution: Search and AI assistants — November 2025

Research lead: Mike Raish, Lead Design Researcher at the Wikimedia Foundation

Read the full report →

Summary of the findings

In order to begin building an empirical basis for the attribution framework, we compared 6 individual attribution signals across two contexts—Search Engine Results Page (SERP) and LLM chatbots—in a 1,186-participant, survey-based experimental study. The goal of the study was to understand the effect that individual signals might have on users' “trust” in both the information presented and Wikipedia as a source. While most signals showed similar performance across scenarios, users behaved quite differently in the two contexts: trust in LLM chat responses was noticeably shaped by the presence of attribution signals, especially when participants were more engaged with the content.

In contrast, trust in search engine results and sources was much less dependent on the presence of attribution. In this context, participants' pre-existing beliefs and browsing habits had a stronger influence than the specific signals being displayed, and differences between the signals' effects were subtle. Overall, attribution signals had a more measurable impact in the LLM context, whereas their effect in SERP environments was harder to detect.

Other relevant resources